The Jungle Book vs. The Jungle Book

Disney’s live-action remake of their 1967 classic, “The Jungle Book” opens today in theaters. It’s already garnered a significant amount of praise, and acclaim. Interestingly, Warner Bros. has announced they’ve changed the name of their upcoming film, “Jungle Book: Origins” to just the “Jungle Book.”

Rudyard Kipling’s “The Jungle Book” is a rich series of novels with many characters that have been portrayed in many different adaptations over the years. Movies, Books, Graphic novels, and radio plays have all shown the characters in great and unique ways. However, the most famous adaptation that has emerged is Walt Disney’s “The Jungle Book.” While the original Disney film bares very little resemblances to the works they’re adapted from (Walt Disney flat-out told the team making the movie to not read them), it offered a very unique and family friendly spin on the story. Today, many people associate “The Jungle Book” with the Disney film, not the series of novels that inspired it.

This new remake by Disney is updating all the classic songs, and contains some very impressive CGI. Weta Digital, the special effects team behind James Cameron’s Avatar, and The Planet of the Apes series, brings the Jungle to life. Despite it’s photorealistic special effects, the entire film was recorded in a soundstage in Los Angeles. The voice actors as well recorded there lines in a recording studio. All the effects, and ambience come from prerecorded tracks and computer effects. Newcomer Neel Sethi shines as protagonist Mowgli, and boasts an even more impressive A-List cast of Bill Murray, Scarlet Johannsen, Christopher Walken, Ben Kingsley, Lupit Nyongo, Idris Elba and others.

Director Andy Serkis and Warner Bros. are creating their own adaption of the Jungle Book, which was originally  titled “Jungle Book: Origins.” Now, it is simply “The Jungle Book.”  This adaptation promises to be a much more truer adaptation of the works by Rudyard Kipling. No singing vultures, no super bright colors, it’s the gritty and faithful thing. The movie will incorporate motion capture, and if there’s any indication of Andy Serkis’s success with motion capture films with animal characters, this adaptation will be phenomenal.

Serkis himself will portray Baloo the Bear, as well with fellow A-listers Benedict Cumberpatch, Cate Blanchett and Christian Bale. Cumberpatch, and Blanchett have both worked previously with Serkis in the Lord of the Rings, and The Hobbit

So why drop the “Origins”? Many different media outlets have been quick to point out that this name change adds confusion to the already existing film by Disney. Indeed it does. Having both movies sharing the same name is incredibly confusing. However, does that mean that the change isn’t necessary in a way?

Motion Captor visonary, Andy Serkis is directing the upcoming Warner Bros. adaptation of “The Jungle Book”, and will be playing the role of Baloo. With several A-list actors attached to voice the characters, with a strong screenplay, there’s little reason to doubt that the film won’t be able stand on its own merits.

A sequel has already been announced for Disney’s 2016 remake, and so Warner Bros. has most likely changed name to ideally avoid any narrative confusion with Disney’s brand. With Andy Serkis’s Imaginarium Productions attached to project, as well as the acclaimed talent in Bale, Blanchett and Cumberpatch, there’s no doubt in anyones mind that this film won’t be great. The “Origins” might imply that the film is a prequel, or an “origin” story to the Disney film. No matter what way the decision cut, it’s an unfortunate one for Warner Bros. who have to compete with giant that Disney is marching forward with.





4 thoughts on “The Jungle Book vs. The Jungle Book

  1. I have also heard that this movie is supposed to be fantastic. I have seen the trailer and some clips and I completely agree that the special effects are incredible. I can’t believe they did the whole thing on a sound stage…I never would have guessed that unless it was said. Do you plan on seeing the movie and writing a review of it?


  2. I know that it is not uncommon for production companies to work on very similar movies at the same time, but what I find interesting is that Warner Bros. has made the decision to title their film almost identical to the Disney adaptation. As a viewer I find this confusing and I’m sure that other people will too. Do you think that Warner Bros. might end up making another name change before the officially release their film?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s